Improving Activities and Learning Outcomes of Procedure Text Lesson Using Cooperative Learning Model with Jigsaw Technique in Junior High School

Hery Krisnanto

Abstract


The purpose of this study are: 1) to find out what is learning model for Reading Comprehension in Procedure Text for class IX C students of Adiwerna 5 State Junior High School Semester I Academic Year 2017/2018; 2) to determine whether cooperative learning model with jigsaw technique can improve Reading Comprehension learning outcomes Material Text Procedure for class IX C students of Adiwerna 5 State Junior High School Semester I Academic Year 2017/2018. This research was conducted for six months from July 2017 to December 2017. July and August 2017 are used to prepare proposals and preparations, September 2017 is used to carry out research, October, November 2017 to collect and analyze data, December 2017 to compile reports and seminars. The subjects of this study were students of class IX C of Adiwerna 5 State Junior High School in Tegal Regency, totaling 34 students with details of 16 men and 18 women. Implemented in 2 cycles, to increase the activity and learning outcomes of Reading Comprehension material Procedure Text by using cooperative learning model with jigsaw technique. Each cycle includes four stages which include the planning, implementation, observation and reflection stages. Based on the analysis of the results of observations and assessments conducted by researchers, it can be concluded that: 1) the results of the study in the pre-cycle reached the percentage of student activity of 38.23% in the first cycle and continued in the second cycle reached the average percentage of student activity by 76.48% , means there is an increase of 38.25%; 2) Learning outcomes of Reading Comprehension in Procedure Text also increases. This can be known as the posttest 1 and posttest 2 values that have been measured by the researcher with the classical learning completeness indicator in the precycle is only 32.35% while in the first cycle it reaches 67.65% means there is an increase of 35.30%, and in cycle II it increased to 85.29%, meaning there was an increase of 17.64%.


Keywords


Learning Activities and Outcomes, Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Techniques

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anita Lie. 2005. Cooperative Learning. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana.

Arends. 1997. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivitis. Jakarta: Prestasti Pustaka Publisher.

Bell-Gredler 1986. Pengertian Belajar. Dalam Winataputra S. Putra. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Hlm. 5. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka

B. Uno. Hamzah. 2009. Teori Motivasi Belajar Dan Pengukurannya. Analisis Di Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Gulo, W. 2002. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Isjoni. 2007. Cooperative Learning Efektifitas Pembelajaran Kelompok. Bandung: Alfabeta

Muijis dan Reynolds. 2008. Effective Teachin (Teori dan Aplikasi). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Slavin, Robert E/ 2005. Cooperative Learning Theory, Research, and Practice N. Yusron. Translation. London: Allemand Bacon. The original book published in 2005.

Sudjana, Nana. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Trianto. 2009. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/jp2d.v1i3.42

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

JP2D (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar) UNTAN Indexed by

 e-ISSN : 2613-9723 p-ISSN : 2613-9715

Jurusan Pendidikan Dasar (PGSD) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu pendidikan

Universitas Tanjungpura

Email Cordinator: Journalpgsdfkipuntan@gmail.com/hartofisika@gmail.com

Plagiarism Tools

     

 Creative Commons License
JP2D (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar) UNTAN is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.